Players

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Tuesday, June 16th, 2026 - 01:54:45 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Jason Brady 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	16	15	16	16	8

Season 12 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
127 174th	.232 247th	7 305th	52 229th	36 205th

Career Honors

S152nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	5	22	.273	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	12.0	2.84
5	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	24	.125	3	1	3	0.25	11	.727	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	4.42
7	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	6	22	.091	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	8.5	5.08
15	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	7	28	.071	7	2	4	0.50	15	.733	0	0.00	1	.000	11.0	4.03
17	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	7	32	.281	5	0	1	0.00	13	.923	0	0.00	1	.000	17.5	8.55
21	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	2	22	.636	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.22
22	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	15	.200	5	2	2	0.67	11	.818	1	0.33	1	1.000	8.5	3.51
31	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	23	.304	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.41
34	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	15	.200	5	0	4	0.00	15	.733	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.48
36	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	6	29	.138	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	1	0.33	1	1.000	10.5	6.77
39	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	10	34	.088	3	1	1	0.20	13	.923	1	0.20	1	1.000	14.0	3.95
44	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	1	9	.667	4	1	2	0.20	15	.867	1	0.20	1	1.000	9.5	3.21
46	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	14	.357	4	0	2	0.00	14	.857	1	0.20	1	1.000	12.0	3.88
Total		52	127	2.44	60	289	.232	47	7	29	0.13	153	.810	5	0.10	9	.556	152.0	4.95

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	13	1.66	38	8	.789	12.0	2.84
5	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	10	10	1	2.50	5	1.25	11	2.15	26	1	.962	13.0	4.42
7	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	12	2.16	25	1	.960	8.5	5.08
15	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	11	1.89	28	3	.893	11.0	4.03
17	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	9	2.25	14	2.34	29	1	.966	17.5	8.55
21	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	5	1.25	19	2.22	32	3	.906	18.0	8.22
22	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	10	1.93	28	4	.857	8.5	3.51
31	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	15	2.39	23	2	.913	11.0	6.41
34	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	6	1.50	12	1.83	29	5	.828	6.5	3.48
36	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	4	2.10	10	0	1.000	10.5	6.77
39	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	20	2.03	40	6	.850	14.0	3.95
44	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	18	2.11	37	5	.865	9.5	3.21
46	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	5	1.00	17	2.00	39	5	.872	12.0	3.88
Total		52	0	36	36	4	0.69	52	1.00	176	2.04	384	44	.885	152.0	4.95