Players

Logan Strand 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	13	12	13	11	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	14	-.071	3	0	3	0.00	8	.625	0	0.00	1	.000	4.0	4.16
2	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	23	.174	6	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.24
4	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	6	28	.214	9	0	3	0.00	18	.833	1	0.25	1	1.000	13.0	6.58
6	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	5	15	-.200	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.41
7	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	15	-.067	2	0	2	0.00	7	.714	1	0.33	1	1.000	4.5	3.43
9	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	20	.150	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	2	0.40	2	1.000	10.0	3.46
10	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	18	.500	3	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.12
12	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	4	29	.414	11	2	1	0.50	19	.947	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.62
14	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	7	17	-.059	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	6.5	4.26
15	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	20	.350	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.11
17	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	20	.400	5	2	2	0.50	16	.875	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.94
19	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	19	.211	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.85
21	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	17	.000	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	6.0	2.96
25	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	14	.143	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	5.0	2.67
29	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	20	.250	5	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	11.0	6.41
33	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	10	-.100	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.25
34	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	16	.250	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.94
39	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	12	.167	4	2	3	0.67	14	.786	.	.	.	.	7.0	1.82
41	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	18	3.60	7	31	.355	12	3	4	0.60	25	.840	.	.	.	.	22.0	6.93
44	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	6	14	-.286	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.80
Total		67	156	2.33	90	372	.177	76	13	29	0.19	217	.866	4	0.06	8	.500	185.5	4.60

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	11	2.04	23	3	.870	4.0	4.16
2	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	6	1.88	16	3	.813	11.5	6.24
4	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	12	3.00	12	1.92	37	2	.946	13.0	6.58
6	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	9	1.81	27	4	.852	3.0	2.41
7	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	7	2.19	21	0	1.000	4.5	3.43
9	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	11	2.20	10	1.89	28	2	.929	10.0	3.46
10	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	5	2.13	15	0	1.000	12.5	7.12
12	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	13	1.94	33	5	.848	19.0	7.62
14	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	14	2.23	22	4	.818	6.5	4.26
15	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	12	1.83	29	4	.862	10.5	5.11
17	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	15	2.03	33	4	.879	15.5	5.94
19	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	14	2.29	28	2	.929	9.5	5.85
21	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	14	2.17	23	3	.870	6.0	2.96
25	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	11	1.83	24	6	.750	5.0	2.67
29	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	2.04	23	3	.870	11.0	6.41
33	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.75	24	5	.792	3.0	1.25
34	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	9	2.00	26	2	.923	9.0	4.94
39	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	7	1.63	24	5	.792	7.0	1.82
41	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	8	1.91	23	2	.913	22.0	6.93
44	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	12	1.84	25	5	.800	3.0	2.80
Total		67	1	31	32	1	0.48	81	1.21	208	1.96	504	64	.873	185.5	4.60