Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	5	0.00	15	.667	0	0.00	3	.000	0.0	6.51
3	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	0	1	0.00	18	.944	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	8.85
5	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	3	0.00	11	.727	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	6.86
6	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	3	1.00	5	.600	1.0	3.97
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	1	0.00	14	.929	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	7.11
9	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	4.10
10	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	4	0.00	13	.692	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	6.75
12	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	3	2	0.60	20	.900	8	1.60	13	.615	3.0	3.14
13	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	3.70
14	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.20	15	.867	6	1.20	10	.600	1.0	5.25
16	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	15	.933	6	1.50	8	.750	0.0	5.76
17	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	2	0.40	17	.882	0	0.00	6	.000	2.0	5.35
19	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	5.78
22	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.20	15	.933	5	1.00	6	.833	1.0	5.65
25	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	0	0.25	14	1.000	8	2.00	12	.667	1.0	7.02
29	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	5.40
31	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	1	3	0.25	19	.842	7	1.75	9	.778	1.0	6.48
36	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	4	0	0.80	18	1.000	6	1.20	9	.667	4.0	6.25
41	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	7	2.33	13	.538	0.0	6.14
44	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	0	5	0.00	18	.722	6	1.50	11	.545	0.0	7.10
46	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	4	0.00	16	.750	6	1.20	8	.750	0.0	7.78
Total		80	.	.	.	.	.	117	14	42	0.18	301	.860	92	1.15	155	.594	14.0	5.95

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	17	2.00	29	6	.793	0.0	6.51
3	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	15	5.00	12	2.18	22	1	.955	0.0	8.85
5	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	8	2.00	16	3	.813	0.0	6.86
6	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	4	1.69	16	3	.813	1.0	3.97
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	11	2.29	17	1	.941	0.0	7.11
9	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.10	21	3	.857	0.0	4.10
10	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	2.30	20	1	.950	0.0	6.75
12	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	10	1.79	28	5	.821	3.0	3.14
13	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	14	2.17	23	3	.870	0.0	3.70
14	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	11	1.83	29	5	.828	1.0	5.25
16	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	14	2.03	36	3	.917	0.0	5.76
17	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	16	2.00	35	5	.857	2.0	5.35
19	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	14	2.15	27	3	.889	0.0	5.78
22	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	17	2.03	35	6	.829	1.0	5.65
25	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	12	2.03	29	3	.897	1.0	7.02
29	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	15	2.07	29	5	.828	0.0	5.40
31	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	9	2.14	14	3	.786	1.0	6.48
36	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	10	2.43	14	2	.857	4.0	6.25
41	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	4	1.91	11	1	.909	0.0	6.14
44	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	10	2.13	23	2	.913	0.0	7.10
46	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	15	2.46	26	0	1.000	0.0	7.78
Total		80	.	.	.	.	.	170	2.13	243	2.07	500	64	.872	14.0	5.95