Players

Patrick Cassone 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	15	15	8	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	14	.143	6	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.13
3	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	8	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.97
5	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	10	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
6	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	0	16	.688	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.64
7	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	11	.455	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.48
9	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	8	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.97
10	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	9	.667	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.95
11	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	5	14	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.58
14	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	10	.200	4	1	3	0.33	13	.769	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.46
16	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	7	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.67
18	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	4	16	.188	14	3	3	0.60	25	.880	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.21
20	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	14	.429	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.24
22	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	15	.467	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.93
23	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	7	18	.056	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.84
26	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	8	.500	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.70
29	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	10	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.03
31	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	19	.474	6	0	2	0.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.77
34	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.27
36	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	8	.125	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
39	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	6	17	.176	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.37
41	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	8	.625	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.02
44	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	12	.583	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.37
46	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	2	22	.682	5	1	3	0.20	15	.800	.	.	.	.	19.5	6.83
Total		85	157	1.85	50	278	.385	40	5	18	0.06	100	.820	.	.	.	.	197.5	5.16

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.13
3	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.97
5	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
6	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.64
7	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	1	5	6	1	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.48
9	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.97
10	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.95
11	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.58
14	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.46
16	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.67
18	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.21
20	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.24
22	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.93
23	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.84
26	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.70
29	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	0	8	8	1	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.03
31	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.77
34	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.27
36	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
39	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.37
41	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.02
44	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.37
46	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	6.83
Total		85	2	67	69	13	0.81	10	0.12	.	.	.	.	.	197.5	5.16