Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	15	.667	0.0	4.68
3	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	5.50
4	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	10	.300	0.0	4.85
5	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	5.08
6	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	6.43
11	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	3	1.000	0.0	4.85
12	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	.333	0.0	6.30
14	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	5	1.000	0.0	8.26
16	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	5.85
17	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	7.73
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	.571	0.0	7.95
21	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	3	.667	0.0	2.05
22	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	.571	0.0	6.83
26	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	9	.444	0.0	4.27
29	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	4	1.000	0.0	6.81
30	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	.500	0.0	10.00
34	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	7.10
35	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	.444	0.0	6.16
40	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	11	.545	0.0	7.48
44	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	5	.400	0.0	5.65
45	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	4	.250	0.0	5.15
Total		78	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	72	0.92	134	.537	0.0	6.14

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	0	1.75	4	0	1.000	0.0	4.68
3	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	2.15	20	0	1.000	0.0	5.50
4	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	9	2.29	17	1	.941	0.0	4.85
5	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.47	15	1	.933	0.0	5.08
6	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	9	2.19	16	1	.938	0.0	6.43
11	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	19	2.29	34	2	.941	0.0	4.85
12	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.42	12	0	1.000	0.0	6.30
14	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	12	2.65	17	0	1.000	0.0	8.26
16	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	2.13	16	0	1.000	0.0	5.85
17	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	8	2.29	17	1	.941	0.0	7.73
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	2.71	7	0	1.000	0.0	7.95
21	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	7	1.63	27	3	.889	0.0	2.05
22	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.50	10	0	1.000	0.0	6.83
26	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	9	2.33	18	1	.944	0.0	4.27
29	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	17	2.65	23	0	1.000	0.0	6.81
30	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	13	2.65	17	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
34	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	2.42	12	1	.917	0.0	7.10
35	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.54	13	0	1.000	0.0	6.16
40	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	13	2.45	20	1	.950	0.0	7.48
44	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	9	2.21	19	2	.895	0.0	5.65
45	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	7	2.15	13	1	.923	0.0	5.15
Total		78	.	.	.	.	.	134	1.72	195	2.31	347	15	.957	0.0	6.14