Players

Ian Kang 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	16	8	16	16

Season 11 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
1,092 6th	21 343rd	32 39th	102 48th	38 203rd

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	15	3	4	1.00	23	.826	35	11.67	55	.636	7.0	8.80
2	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	25	8.33	75	.333	1.0	3.20
3	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	5	.000	5	1	2	0.20	17	.882	43	8.60	94	.457	3.5	4.70
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	1	0	1	0.00	10	.900	36	12.00	62	.581	2.5	7.68
6	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	3	11	-.273	7	1	4	0.25	18	.778	53	13.25	89	.596	1.0	8.09
7	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	2	7	-.143	4	1	0	0.20	19	1.000	62	12.40	91	.681	3.5	6.92
9	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	1	6	-.167	5	2	4	0.40	19	.789	64	12.80	104	.615	3.0	7.40
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	4	0	3	0.00	12	.750	43	14.33	64	.672	0.5	8.54
12	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	3	.000	4	0	3	0.00	18	.833	59	14.75	100	.590	1.5	8.80
13	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	5	.200	10	2	3	0.50	21	.857	52	13.00	86	.605	4.0	9.35
16	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	8	.000	14	5	2	1.00	27	.926	60	12.00	106	.566	7.5	8.18
18	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	3	.000	6	1	3	0.25	17	.824	51	12.75	81	.630	2.0	8.08
19	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	2	1.000	10	1	1	0.25	21	.952	51	12.75	88	.580	3.5	8.59
22	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	5	.000	8	2	2	0.40	23	.913	58	11.60	100	.580	4.5	7.21
23	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	8	.250	9	4	2	1.00	19	.895	46	11.50	81	.568	7.5	6.94
25	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	3	1	3	0.33	11	.727	37	12.33	72	.514	1.5	6.68
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	3	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	37	12.33	63	.587	3.5	7.56
30	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	1	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	32	10.67	67	.478	0.5	4.30
33	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	3	0	1.00	20	1.000	36	12.00	61	.590	3.0	7.23
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	9	.111	2	0	1	0.00	14	.929	49	12.25	76	.645	3.0	6.88
38	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	2	.000	15	1	4	0.20	29	.862	59	11.80	99	.596	1.0	6.93
43	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	5	.600	8	0	0	0.00	20	1.000	49	12.25	71	.690	5.0	8.58
48	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	2	3	-.333	7	2	3	0.50	18	.833	55	13.75	83	.663	3.5	8.77
Total		90	21	0.23	17	108	.037	156	32	46	0.36	407	.887	1092	12.13	1868	.585	73.5	7.37

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	8.80
2	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.20
3	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.70
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	2	1.00	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.68
6	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.09
7	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.92
9	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.40
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	8.54
12	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.80
13	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.35
16	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	8.18
18	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.08
19	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.59
22	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.21
23	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.94
25	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	6.68
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.56
30	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	4.30
33	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.23
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.88
38	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	6.93
43	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.58
48	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.77
Total		90	3	35	38	8	0.42	102	1.13	.	.	.	.	.	73.5	7.37